Bajaj Housing Finance Limited
Housing
Finance Company
Annual Returns


Cumulative Returns and Drawdowns


Ownership

Margined

AI Summary
asof: 2026-09-16
BAJAJHFL: Recent Corporate Developments
1. Headwinds and Challenges
- Rising leverage: The debt-equity ratio increased to
4.75 as of 30 June 2026 from 4.31 as of 30 June 2025, and total debts to
total assets rose to 0.82 from 0.81 over the same period.
- Higher interest expense growth than interest income
growth: Interest expenses grew 18% year-on-year in Q1 FY27
(₹1,888 crore vs ₹1,606 crore), outpacing interest income growth of 15%
(₹2,856 crore vs ₹2,493 crore). Net interest income growth was
consequently lower at 9%.
- Decline in net gain on fair value changes: This
fell 39% year-on-year in Q1 FY27 to ₹23 crore from ₹38 crore.
- Lower capital adequacy and liquidity coverage
ratios: The capital to risk-weighted assets ratio declined to
21.59% as of 30 June 2026 from 26.94% as of 30 June 2025. The Liquidity
Coverage Ratio declined to 158.12% from 210.57% over the same period,
though both remain above regulatory requirements (15% and 100%
respectively).
- Modest “Others” AUM contraction: The “Others”
product category declined 1% year-on-year to ₹1,708 crore in Q1
FY27.
- Elevated abstentions and dissent on certain resolutions at
the 18th AGM (29 July 2026): On the special resolution for
issue of non-convertible debentures through private placement, 0.0355%
of total e-votes were against. On the ordinary resolution for approval
of material related party transactions with Bajaj Finance Limited,
0.2169% of total e-votes were against, and the promoter/promoter group
were interested in this resolution and did not vote. On the resolution
to re-appoint Rajeev Jain as director, 0.081% of total e-votes were
against.
2. Tailwinds and Growth Prospects
- Strong disbursements growth: Disbursements grew 33%
year-on-year in Q1 FY27 to ₹19,509 crore from ₹14,651 crore in Q1
FY26.
- Robust AUM growth: Assets under Management grew 24%
year-on-year to ₹1,49,624 crore as of 30 June 2026 from ₹1,20,420 crore
as of 30 June 2025. Loan Assets also grew 24% to ₹1,31,162 crore.
- Product-wise AUM growth (Q1 FY27 vs Q1 FY26):
- Home Loans: ₹80,865 crore, up 20%
- Loan against property: ₹15,445 crore, up 22%
- Lease rental discounting: ₹34,604 crore, up 41%
- Developer Finance: ₹17,002 crore, up 19%
- Profitability growth: Profit before tax increased
23% year-on-year to ₹929 crore in Q1 FY27 from ₹757 crore. Profit after
tax also increased 23% to ₹715 crore from ₹583 crore.
- Net total income growth: Increased 16% year-on-year
to ₹1,175 crore in Q1 FY27 from ₹1,009 crore.
- Fee income growth: Fees and commission income grew
81% year-on-year to ₹105 crore in Q1 FY27 from ₹58 crore.
- Sale of services and income on de-recognised loans:
Grew 278% year-on-year to ₹68 crore in Q1 FY27 from ₹18 crore.
- Improved operating efficiency: Operating Expenses
to Net Total Income was 19.6% in Q1 FY27 versus 21.2% in Q1 FY26.
- Lower credit costs: Loan losses and provisions fell
58% year-on-year to ₹16 crore in Q1 FY27 from ₹38 crore in Q1 FY26.
- Improved asset quality: Gross NPA declined to 0.29%
as of 30 June 2026 from 0.30% as of 30 June 2025. Net NPA declined to
0.12% from 0.13%. Provision coverage on stage 3 assets improved to
58.53% from 56.25%.
- Improved return on equity: ROE (annualised)
improved to 12.5% in Q1 FY27 from 11.6% in Q1 FY26. ROA (annualised) was
stable at 2.3%.
- Net worth growth: Net worth grew 13% year-on-year
to ₹23,234 crore as of 30 June 2026 from ₹20,508 crore.
- Strong credit ratings: The Company holds AAA/Stable
for its long-term debt programme from CRISIL and India Ratings, and A1+
for its short-term debt programme from CRISIL and India Ratings.
- Loan assignment and acquisition activity: During Q1
FY27, the Company assigned loans through direct assignment (9 accounts
with 1% MRR amounting to ₹1,898.70 crore; 1,640 accounts with 10% MRR
amounting to ₹729.54 crore) and acquired loans (8,246 accounts amounting
to ₹1,466.74 crore with 90% beneficial economic interest).
- Investor engagement: The Company scheduled
analyst/institutional investor meetings in Singapore (24–25 August 2026)
and Hong Kong (26 August 2026).
3. Key Risks
- Regulatory and compliance risk: The Company is
regulated by the RBI, SEBI, and IRDAI, and supervised by the NHB. It is
classified as an Upper Layer NBFC under the RBI’s Scale Based
Regulations. Changes in regulations, including the RBI (Non-Banking
Financial Companies – Transfer and Distribution of Credit Risk)
Directions and the RBI (Non-Banking Financial Companies – Financial
Statements: Presentation and Disclosures) Directions dated 28 November
2025, could affect operations.
- Credit risk: Gross NPA was 0.29% and Net NPA was
0.12% as of 30 June 2026. Provision coverage on stage 3 assets was
58.53%.
- Liquidity risk: The Liquidity Coverage Ratio was
158.12% as of 30 June 2026, down from 210.57% as of 30 June 2025, though
above the 100% regulatory requirement.
- Capital adequacy risk: The capital to risk-weighted
assets ratio was 21.59% as of 30 June 2026, down from 26.94% as of 30
June 2025, though above the 15% regulatory requirement.
- Concentration risk: The Company’s operations are
primarily in the business of financing, with no separate reportable
segments as per Ind AS 108.
- Related party risk: Material related party
transactions with Bajaj Finance Limited (the parent company) require
shareholder approval, which was obtained at the 18th AGM on 29 July
2026.
- Interest rate risk: Interest expenses grew 18%
year-on-year in Q1 FY27, outpacing interest income growth of 15%,
compressing net interest income growth to 9%.
- Security cover risk: The Company must maintain
security cover for its listed non-convertible debentures as per the
terms of the Offer Documents/Information Memorandum and Debenture Trust
Deed. The auditors’ certificate dated 29 July 2026 confirmed that as at
30 June 2026, the Company maintained the required security cover.
Broker Narrative
The narrative shifted from unconditional optimism in the first report
(no headwinds, highlighting new business lines and strong
capitalization) to a qualified Buy acknowledging NIM compression from
competition, muted demand, and asset-quality deterioration in LAP and
developer finance, while still citing AUM growth above guidance, strong
segment performance, and management efficiency targets as positives.
Despite predominantly bullish calls, actual returns were negative across
all reports with multiple DISAPPOINTMENT outcomes.
Fears that came true
- Intense competition in the prime housing segment pressured NIMs
exactly as flagged, with Q1 NIM down 14 bps QoQ and FY27 NIM guided to
moderate 20-25 bps, correlating with DISAPPOINTMENT outcomes on Buy
calls.
- Asset yield contraction of ~60 bps YoY due to competitive pressure
and the falling rate cycle materialized as a key risk, consistent with
uniformly negative actual returns across the call history.
- Muted demand and slow system growth flagged as a headwind came true,
with FY26 system growth remaining slow, aligning with the -34.8%
DISAPPOINTMENT outcome on the first Buy call.
- Asset-quality pockets weakened as flagged: LAP GNPA rose 16 bps QoQ
to 62 bps and developer finance GNPA jumped to 12 bps from 3 bps due to
one account slippage.
Optimism that failed
- New business lines (urban B2C, rural B2C, mortgage) and extensive
product and geographic expansion were expected to drive growth but
failed to prevent a -34.8% actual return (DISAPPOINTMENT) on the first
Buy call.
- Strong capitalization (tier-1 ratio 20.9%) and BHFL IPO proceeds
were touted as tailwinds supporting a bullish thesis but could not
sustain positive returns, as every Buy call with a positive predicted
return produced a negative actual return.
Broker Timeline
12 broker calls · 2024-10-25 to 2026-07-30
Copyright © 2023 SAS Data Analytics Pvt. Ltd. All rights reserved.
🐞